Shure SM58S vs Sennheiser e835

What published reviews say about each, where the two differ, and who each one suits.

Summed up from 14 published reviews

Shure

SM58S

The Shure SM58S is a rugged, proven live-vocal microphone with useful self-muting, but it is not a versatile studio or digital-recording solution.

Best for: Live vocalists and presenters who need reliable, self-managed muting.
Skip it if: You need quiet-studio fidelity, USB output, or a switch-free stage setup.

PriceToday's price on AmazonView on Amazon

What reviewers say about the Shure SM58S

Sennheiser

e835

A budget-friendly dynamic microphone with strong vocal presence, rugged construction, and broad live/studio usefulness, tempered by brightness and possible feedback issues.

Best for: Budget-conscious speakers, podcasters, and live performers wanting clear, durable vocals.
Skip it if: You need studio-grade detail, warm tone, or strong loud-stage feedback control.

PriceToday's price on AmazonView on Amazon

What reviewers say about the Sennheiser e835

Affiliate link · we may earn a commission

Specs side by side

Spec	Shure SM58S	Sennheiser e835
Connection	XLR	XLR
Capsule	Dynamic	Dynamic
Best for	Singing & instruments, Podcasts & voice	Singing & instruments, Podcasts & voice
Type	Handheld	Handheld
Boom arm	No	No
RGB	No	No

Rows where the two differ come first.

What reviewers like, and what they don't

Shure SM58S

Rugged, reliable construction suits demanding live environments. 1 2 3 4
On/off switch provides convenient muting between speakers. 1 2 3 5
Cardioid pattern helps suppress background noise and feedback. 1 4
Works without phantom power, keeping setup relatively simple. 2 6
A proven choice for intelligible live vocals and spoken-word use. 2 4 5 6
Switch can be accidentally toggled or become unreliable over time. 2 3 5
Opening the signal path may produce audible pops. 2 3
Less suited to quiet studios, podcasts, and some instrument duties. 1 2 6

Sennheiser e835

Affordable price with solid performance for beginners and professionals. 1 2 4 6
Clear, present vocals cut through mixes and suit speech. 1 2 3 4
Rugged, simple XLR design suits live and studio use. 2 3 4 5
Cardioid isolation and handling-noise control help in live setups. 2 3 4 5
Handles loud sources and high SPL without obvious distortion. 2 4 5 7
Bright, forward tone can feel harsh or unnatural to some voices. 1 4 7 8
Loud stages and strong high-frequency monitors can trigger feedback. 1 4 5
Less high-end finesse than premium condensers or newer dynamics. 1 3 8
Off-axis rejection is less advanced than supercardioid or multipattern models. 3 8

Sources

We don't test products ourselves. This page sums up 14 published reviews, read on October 21, 2026; each point above links to the reviews that make it.